This site now acts as an archive only. For the latest news, opinion, blogs and listings on disability arts and culture visit

Disability Arts Online

> > > > The anti-war poem ‘Disabled’ by Wilfred Owen

19 September 2014

Emmeline Burdett gives an analysis of one of the most famous anti-war poems of all time from the hand of the First World War Poet, Wilfred Owen. In a bid to evoke what Owen called ‘the pity of War’ the poem ‘Disabled’ gives impairment an emblematic status which, argues Burdett, impacts on attitudes today.

This is a plate from Wilfred Owen's 1920 Poems by Wilfred Owen, showing the author side-on, dressed in his military uniform

Plate from Poems by Wilfred Owen, (Chatto & Windus 1920)

Wilfred Owen’s powerful anti-war poem ‘Disabled’ (1917) was republished in the Guardian newspaper on November 13 2008, as part of the newspaper’s seven-day focus on aspects of the First World War. That day’s topic was ‘Art and War’, and it included discussions of how artists and writers had sought to turn their experiences of the First World War into art.

Owen’s poem was published by itself with no commentary and no explanation given for its presence, so the reader was left to make up his or her own mind. 

The poem ‘Disabled’ was written while its author was a patient at Craiglockhart War Hospital in Scotland.  Owen had been sent to Craiglockhart after being diagnosed with ‘neurasthenia’ (‘shell-shock’). It was here that he met his fellow poet Siegfried Sassoon, who was also a patient. 

The writer Robert Graves, who had come to the hospital to visit Sassoon, read ‘Disabled’ and praised it highly. As an anti-war poem, ‘Disabled’ is moving and powerful, but when looked at for its portrayal of disability, it is extremely problematic, invoking as it does familiar disablist tropes of asexuality, helplessness and hopelessness. The poem has an omniscient narrator, who tells the story of the central character, an unnamed ex-soldier, who has returned from the Great War with severe and life-changing injuries:

He sat in a wheeled chair, waiting for dark, 
And shivered in his ghastly suit of grey,
Legless, sewn short at elbow…..
(‘Disabled’, lines 1-3)

These few lines paint a melancholy picture, both of the extent of the soldier’s injuries (he appears to have lost at least three, and possibly four limbs), and also of his isolation – in describing him as ‘waiting for dark’ Owen suggests that he has nothing and no-one to distract him from his thoughts or to help him fill time. 

As the poem continues, Owen builds upon the sense of loss and despair that he has created,  leaving the reader in no doubt that, before the soldier received his injuries, his life had been full of excitement, promise, and hope:

About this time Town used to swing so gay
When glow-lamps budded in the light blue trees
And girls glanced lovelier as the air grew dim,
In the old times, before he threw away his knees.
(lines 7-10)

Since being invalided out of the army and sent back to hospital in Britain, however, the soldier’s prospects (particularly of being the object of a girl’s romantic desires) have vanished:

Now he will never feel again how slim 
Girls’ waists are, or how warm their subtle hands,
All of them touch him like some queer disease.
(lines 11-13)

These lines make it clear that Owen wants to show that enforced celibacy will now be the soldier’s lot, and that if anyone does look at him, it will only be as an object of pity. This impression is reinforced in the final lines of the poem:

Now, he will spend a few sick years in institutes
And do what things the rules consider wise,
And take whatever pity they may dole.
Tonight, he noticed how the women’s eyes
Passed from him to the strong men that were whole.
How cold and late it is! Why don’t they come
And put him into bed? Why don’t they come? 
                (lines 40-46)

Though this final stanza, like the rest of the poem, is extremely moving, it is also highly problematic. Owen portrays the soldier in such a way as to leave the reader in absolutely no doubt that, now he is disabled, all the things that made his life fulfilling and enjoyable are irretrievably lost. 

There are two points to bear in mind here. Firstly, Owen himself had seen much front-line service, and furthermore he wrote ‘Disabled’ whilst a patient in a military hospital. Consequently, he would have been well aware of the kinds of life-changing injuries that soldiers invalided out of the Great War could receive.   

Secondly, Owen was a highly political poet, who was – or who, at least, became – a passionate critic of the Great War. In his other poetry – most notably in works like ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ – he raged against the lies that he insisted had induced young men in their millions to join the armed forces, to fight and die for their country. 

One of Owen’s most famous pronouncements was ‘My subject is War, and the pity of War. The poetry is in the Pity’.  By this he meant that war was the ultimate evil, subverting all the values that human beings might  hold dear – values such as goodness, justice, compassion. 

In this way the maimed soldier in ‘Disabled’ is an emblematic figure – one who shows the terrible cost of war. But as Disability Studies academics and activists have shown, to afford disabled characters a purely emblematic status is both to shield oneself from the reality of continuing to live life and exist in the world with an impairment, and to adopt an overly fatalistic attitude to the difficulties – both physical and psychological – that someone with an impairment may experience.

Throughout the poem, for example, Owen impresses upon the reader the soldier’s isolation: he has no-one with him, he has no prospects, he will never be a husband or father, the only gazes he will attract will be ones of pity or embarrassment. 

In this way Owen leaves the image of the maimed ex-soldier hanging, as if in aspic. He is a monument to Owen’s hatred of war, but he does not exist as a real human being. This squeamish refusal to consider how life might continue once someone has acquired a severe impairment arguably persists in our own times with the widespread support for assisted suicide, the adherents of which claim to be motivated by compassion and respect for personal freedom, but who may in reality be hampered by a refusal to consider seriously how life may be lived in a different way.

Related content: you may also be interested in a feature by poet Owen Lowery on the WW1 poetry of Keith Douglas, Alan Ross, Wilfred Owen and Edward Thomas


Colin Hambrook

30 September 2014

Firstly the poems and more by Wilfred Owen can be found online at

I think the problem with Disabled is that the smashed-up, broken-down young man doesn’t come across as a real person.

He seems, rather more like an emblem identified wholly by the person he was before he lost his legs; and as such a person who is wholly shunned by virtue of the fact that he no longer has legs.

The atrocities the subject of the poem endured are implied, between the lines, rather than portrayed explicitly. Poems like Anthem for Doomed Youth, Mental Cases and Dulce et Decorum est are more effective because they are descriptive of the horrors of war.

Disabled, it seems to me, is essentially about an absence; the lack of legs, the lack of love and sex and ultimately the lack of someone to tuck the soldier into bed.

Emmeline Burdett

29 September 2014

Many thanks for your feedback, Deborah. I had never thought about whether the poem might seem different if it had a different title - I suppose that a title such as 'Regret' might encourage the reader to approach the poem differently. I mean, as the title is 'Disabled' it is, I think, clear that the reader is supposed to regard the soldier's physical state as the reason why his life is effectively over. A title such as 'Regret' on the other hand, is perhaps more gentle and reflective, and might encourage the reader to look at the soldier's situation somewhat more holistically, raising questions about what exactly the soldier is regretting? The loss of his former vigour? His loneliness and isolation? His decision to join up? In raising these questions it's possible that the soldier would emerge from the poem as much more truly human that the emblem to 'the pity of war' that Owen has made him.

I also take your point about portraying disability truthfully. When I was writing the analysis, I was rather aware that I was in danger of suggesting that the loss of several limbs was something that anyone it happened to could regard with equanimity. It isn't, but I think that in relation to Owen's poem, I was criticizing the way in which Owen makes the soldier as tragic a figure as he possibly can, for his own socio-political ends. His portrayal doesn't leave any room for the soldier to regain any kind of pleasure, to make friends or to have a relationship.

Deborah Caulfield

29 September 2014

An interesting analysis, with which it would be hard to disagree. Not that I want to. Rather, it made me think...

I wonder if the problem would be so great if the poem had a different title, e.g. 'Wounded Out', or 'Loss of Life', or 'Regret'. Not that this would make the description of disability any better.

Yet the poem is about more than the state of the soldier's post-war body.

It's also about the invincibility of youth, the love of rough and tumble, and not being scared by the sight of blood. It dispels the myth that sport and war are the same thing.

As anti-war propaganda, 'Disabled' is very effective. Its portrayal of a smashed-up, broken-down young man is key to this.

Bombs do a lot more than make big holes in the ground. They blow people's bodies to bits; arms and legs come off, easily.

How to describe this without saying it's tragic, without showing a victim, without evoking feelings of sorrow?

Would that this were enough to put a stop to war, to find other ways to resolve conflict. More's the pity...

Of course, we're tired of seeing 'disability' always portrayed as a dark and dismal place, devoid of laughter, fun and sex.

Is it so hard to write about 'disability' truthfully?

Add a comment

Please leave your comments. They will display when submitted. DAO encourages critical feedback, but please be considerate. DAO reserves the right to edit or remove comments that don't comply with our editorial policy, which you can find on DAOs 'About' pages.

Your e-mail address will not be revealed to the public.
HTML is forbidden, but line-breaks will be retained.
This can be a URL of an image or a YouTube, MySpaceTV or a Flickr page (we'll handle the media embedding from there!)
This is to prevent automatic submissions.